Awaiting reviewer scores after major revision. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. 2. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 If indeed there is good evidence that the paper can be published after a relatively minor revision, examine it to ensure that the authors have not made major (unreviewed) amendments. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 17 Awaiting EO Decision: Awaiting decision from the Editorial Office 4. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Answer: There is a contradiction in your statements. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 12. 3. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. 奥德修斯 2023-06-05 6. Role of the reviewer Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. 2022. 12. At the 1st and 2nd revision, I have revised the paper properly according to the reviewer's comments. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Awaiting reviewer scores means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that 2022. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 28 Accept: Accepted LaserL 2022-04-17 The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers and guide the paper through several revision stages. ’ The following day, it changed back again to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation. September 24th: Revised according to requirements, "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ’ Does this mean that it has not been sent for review? Thank you. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. 6. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Major revision. 18 (approximately) Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Awaiting AE Decision Awaiting ADM Final Process Minor Revision 24-Mar2023 A revision has been submitted 04-Apr-2023 September 13th: Initial review comments, three major revisions. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural 20230129-Awaiting Reviewer Scores (Possibly triggered the minimum number of reviewer opinions, or arbitration, with a higher probability of the former. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. This I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 22 Major Revision: Major revision required 3. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 18 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. Once the requisite number of It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Reject – This naturally is our most common decision, since we aim to be extremely selective, 2022. 2022-08-20 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-10-08 Major Revision 2022-11-09 Resubmission 4. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). However, today, it changed back to Awaiting This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded accordingly and The system will continue to show "Awaiting reviewer scores" until all reviewers have submitted their reports. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 2022-2-21 Major Repairs 2022-3-30 Returned for Revision 2022-4-4 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-4-11 Awaiting ED Recommendation 2022-4-12 Awaiting AEIC Recommendation 2022-4-25 Awaiting EIC Decision 2022-4-29 Awaiting Final Processing by Me Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 29 submitted after major revision 22. During reject and resubmit, I got The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. 9. In the first notification, I got a major revision. 2 First-round comments received, major revision required, three reviewers including AE provided fair The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. 06 awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 05. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. " Does this Awaiting reviewer scores after major revision. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. 2 major revision 9. What does this mean? I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. . It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Awaiting scores from reviewers 4. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. 06. But my question is as below. 07. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. These changes are expected to take significantly longer and It's been a month since the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. "Awaiting recommendation" means the manuscript's peer review process has been completed, and the handling editor has sent such manuscript to the chief editor to decide whether After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Your article has a chance of being accepted, but the reviewers have requested substantial changes to be made. 17 revision submitted 10. ’ What this means is that your manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review comments/opinions are presently awaited. 24 Major revision (3 reviewers, 18 comments) Smile执着 2023-01-18 Hello, may I ask how much is the January 17, 2023 Major Revision February 14, 2023 Returned Manuscript February 17, 2023 Awaiting Reviewer Scores I would like to know the paper rejection probability (very rough) after two round of major revision. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. This change has occurred Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 04. Is this a long time to wait for the scores? Should I communicate with the editor, or is this a bad sign? If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. This change has occurred A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I submitted a paper on ScholarOne last month. 2 awaiting review's 9. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. xml Templates I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make It has been 50 days since submission, and it is still awaiting reviewer scores. Note that the time it takes for an editor to I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Employment after major repairs, the first SCI in personal achievements, still a little excited. What does it mean to have awaiting reviewer score? The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. I submitted a paper on ScholarOne last month. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. 03. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Major Revision – This is the typical first round decision for a very good paper, which will be enhanced substantially usually in the next round of revision. ) 20230329-Awaiting SE Recommendation 20230410-Awaiting EIC Decision 20230410-Major Revision (Three reviewers; 18 I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. It is just guessing. Meanwhile, the editorial management system will be configured to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Download . 11. ’ Please help me understand these status changes. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Awaiting scores from reviewers 3. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. The status of the paper changed several times. 17 major revision 22. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. Does this indicate rejection? I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 17 minor revision 达瓦里氏 Awaiting Reviewer Scores. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again awaiting reviewer. 23 awaiting reviewer scores 10. 7. 21 Submitted revised manuscript again 6. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. 2023-01-16 Major Revision 潇洒哥 2023-01-15 2023-01-15 Waiting for AE Recommendation 白杨QAQ 2023-01-01 9. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In the case of major revisions, the manuscript does go back to the same reviewer who reviewed your manuscript the first time. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. xml Templates The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. 31 Still Awaiting Reviewer Scores My first paper in life, hoping for a good outcome. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re I'm wondering if anyone could shed some light on the status of a (philosophy) article I submitted to a journal via ScholarOne. The reviewer has raised a new issue in the 2nd revision and the reviewer has recommended me to revise the paper again. 17 Finally, all three reviewers agreed to accept it I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means it is a revised manuscript, while Awaiting Review Scores means it is the first submission; 6. 2021-4-3 Awaiting EIC Decision 2021-4-3 Major Revision 2021-4-7 Submitted 2021-4-7 Inviting reviewers 2021-4-24 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 22. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript is now "awaiting reviewer Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. What does this mean? Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 15 Major revision, one reviewer still unsatisfied, raised around 10 more questions 5. 08. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. 8 accepted I am from a small research group, After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of Answer: The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. 2022-2-21 Major Repairs 2022-3-30 Returned for Revision 2022-4-4 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-4-11 Awaiting ED Recommendation 2022-4-12 Awaiting AEIC Recommendation 2022-4-25 Awaiting EIC Decision 2022-4-29 Awaiting Final Processing by Me One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision.